<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metro light rail ridership numbers for February 09’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raillife.com/blog/2009/03/12/metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-february-09%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raillife.com/blog/2009/03/12/metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-february-09%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Phoenix Light Rail news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://raillife.com/blog/2009/03/12/metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-february-09%e2%80%99/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/2009/03/12/Metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-February-09-.aspx#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, I am also curious about those numbers. Hopefully, the quarterly reports they have promised will give us a better idea and much more detailed information. I was kind of surprised at the drop in Sunday ridership as I had been told they felt the weekends had grown. Recreational use appears strong but the weekly numbers look great. I have a feeling the ASU students have a little to do with weekly numbers as I believe they were still on winter break for much of Jan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, I am also curious about those numbers. Hopefully, the quarterly reports they have promised will give us a better idea and much more detailed information. I was kind of surprised at the drop in Sunday ridership as I had been told they felt the weekends had grown. Recreational use appears strong but the weekly numbers look great. I have a feeling the ASU students have a little to do with weekly numbers as I believe they were still on winter break for much of Jan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://raillife.com/blog/2009/03/12/metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-february-09%e2%80%99/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/2009/03/12/Metro-light-rail-ridership-numbers-for-February-09-.aspx#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Great to see the new line is going above and beyond projections. Interesting switch from Jan -&gt; Feb, it looks like the line might be settling more into a weekday commuter ridership pattern.

Do you know if any numbers are available on the effect the new LRT line has had on the system as a whole? I was interested in how many of these 30K LRT riders are brand new transit riders, or whether they shifted over from nearby bus routes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see the new line is going above and beyond projections. Interesting switch from Jan -> Feb, it looks like the line might be settling more into a weekday commuter ridership pattern.</p>
<p>Do you know if any numbers are available on the effect the new LRT line has had on the system as a whole? I was interested in how many of these 30K LRT riders are brand new transit riders, or whether they shifted over from nearby bus routes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

